Below is a video highlighting topics from the ABA National Summit on Innovation in Legal Services held at Stanford Law School last month. At 7:00 minutes is a section with comments from speakers at the Summit, including myself and Professor David Wilkins of Harvard Law School, on the topic of measuring the quality of legal services.
read moreLegal Metrics
Measuring the Subjective
Abstract This article describes a generalized approach to measuring subjective notions of quality. It shows how using a particular mathematical framework can yield several beneficial properties. These properties allow for measurements of complex, subjective notions of value or quality that are intuitive and easily tailored to a particular individual and data set. This example shows […]
read more
UPL, Technology, and Access to Justice
I was asked to participate on a panel at the ABA’s Center for Professional Responsibility’s 2nd UPL School in Chicago on April 17th. The panel topic was “The Users and Abusers: Technology and the Unauthorized Practice of Law“. I’d written a guest blog at MyCase in 2013 called “Using A Document Automation System – Authorized […]
read more
Quality Metric Example: Litigation Witness Files
I recently discussed the importance of standardized quality metrics. I’ll work through the process of how to define such metrics — this is an exercise and not intended to be a definitive solution. As a starting point, I recently met with Novus Law to see what types of metrics they were using for quality control. […]
read more
Getting To New Law: Standardized Quality Metrics
I was at a gathering a while back that happened to include the General Counsel of a Fortune 100 company. I asked him if he measured ROI on his legal spend. “No,” he said, “I can’t.” Why not? “I can’t measure quality.” I suspect, though, that he meant “I can’t measure quality yet.” At various […]
read more